With at least 90 years experience between them, three veteran translators and interpreters no longer qualify for the job under new national rules that take effect this month.
The three men said they stopped getting work because of a change in the way the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters certifies qualified professionals.
Ali Bazzi, Kim Vo and Ninh Nguyen each have at least 30 years of experience and were awarded “permanent accreditation” in the late 1980s.
The Department of Home Affairs confirmed its national Translating and Interpreting Service had updated its policy of allocating jobs so practitioners with new credentials were “offered interpreting assignments ahead of the practitioners with the pre-2018 model of certification”.
A department spokesman said practitioners had until December 31, 2019, to transition to the new system of certification. Transitioning involved filling out paperwork and was free until June 2019, after which a $121 fee was introduced. Under the new system, certification renewal and professional development must be undertaken every three years.
“The new certification system reflects the industry expectations of minimum standards of performance across various areas of competency,” the spokesman said.
Mr Bazzi said the professional programs were appropriate for people entering the profession, but were “too basic, irrelevant and unsuitable for experienced practitioners”.
“Refusing to transition to the new system has resulted in many practitioners having their workload reduced or receiving no work at all,” he said.
Mr Bazzi said he “very reluctantly” decided to transition last month despite having worked as an interpreter for courts, police, government and international conferences since 1985. He has a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts in linguistics and translation from the University of Western Sydney awarded in 1998.
The authority awarded Mr Vo a certificate of excellence for his Vietnamese and English translation skills in 2011 and has previously appointed him to its panel of examiners. He has taught at the University of Western Sydney and worked as a legal interpreter for government agencies for 28 years.
“People with less experience are given priority over me now,” he said.
Mr Vo said he refused to transition to the new accreditation system as a “matter of principle”.
“I consider myself to be very experienced and fully qualified,” he said. “They are now saying if I don’t transition into the new system then I am not current, I am not up to date. How does that make sense?”
Mr Nguyen earned a Master of Arts and a PhD for his interpreting and linguistics studies at Macquarie University. He taught interpreting and translation at TAFE, the University of Western Sydney and University of Sydney until 2009. He does not agree his qualifications are no longer valid, but has applied to transition into the new system.
A spokesman for the authority said more than 10,000 practitioners have transitioned since the new system was introduced in January 2018. The opportunity to transition closed at the end of December and “a small number decided against doing so”.
The spokesman said the authority decided to move to a universal national certification system to ensure all practitioners met the same requirements, “irrespective of the credentials they hold and when they were attained”.
“The vast majority of experienced practitioners did transition and the very small minority that chose not to, made that decision despite the warning that it would likely result in less work opportunities,” the spokesman said. “NAATI advised that it anticipated that the inherent value of the old accreditation credentials would diminish as certification became the industry standard.”
Source: Thanks smh.com