Macquarie Group and Commonwealth Bank are facing fresh scrutiny of their oversight of anti-money laundering laws after it emerged that overseas banks had reported close to $167 million of potential dirty money transactions flowing through the two Australian banks.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) has released a massive leak of secret bank reports, which show that Commonwealth Bank was flagged by overseas banks over millions of dollars of transactions, including some in crime hotspots in far eastern Russia and in Kazakhstan.
Data released by the ICIJ on Monday shows more than $174 million of possibly dirty money flowed through Australian banks. Macquarie made up 72 per cent of the suspicious transactions by value, or $123 million.
The Commonwealth Bank was the next frequently named Australian bank in the data leak, with $44 million of transactions flowing from or to the CBA, which were red flagged by other banks. ANZ Bamk, when including its Hong Kong branch, made up $4.7 million.
The three banks at the centre of the ICIJ leak dubbed the “FinCen Leak”, Bank of New York Mellon (BNY), Barclays and Standard Charted, all filed the reports with anti-money laundering authorities in the US as part of their reporting requirements.
Banks around the world are required to report suspicious transactions to anti-money laundering regulators to stamp out dirty money dealings like funding for terrorism, organised crime like drug dealing and tax evasion.
It is not clear whether the Australian banks reported the transactions to the local money laundering regulator AUSTRAC. Anti-money laundering laws dictate that any payment over $10,000 must be reported to authorities as potentially suspicious as well as transactions that are indicative of potential crimes like an account making several smaller payments to avoid the $10,000 detection threshold.
CBA settled a massive civil case brought by AUSTRAC over the bank’s failure to report suspicious transactions for $700 million in 2018. It is not clear whether the transactions included in the lICIJ report formed a part of AUSTRAC’s case.
Macquarie has faced no court action from AUSTRAC, and its senior executive Greg Ward said in 2019 that the bank had no outstanding matters with the local money-laundering regulator.
The CBA’s payments detail the global reach of Australia’s largest bank. BNY flagged seven payments totalling $90,000 to CBA account holders from the Primorye Bank, located in the far eastern Russian city of Vladivostok, near the border with North Korea.
BNY also flagged eight payments totalling $77,800 to CBA accounts from the Kazakhstan’s Bank Centercredit. The New York bank also flagged a $41,180 payment a CBA account holder received from Latvian bank BlueOrange (named in the data under its former trading name Baltikums Bank). Payments from Deustche Bank’s Czech arm to CBA totalling over $40 million were also flagged by BNY.
The cache also shows a large number of potentially structured transactions sent from Baclay’s Hong Kong arm to CBA in 2016 and from UK bank Natwest’s arm in the tax haven of Gibraltar.
BNY flagged 94 possibly suspicious transactions involving Macquarie in 2016. This included a report on nine transactions flowing from Macquarie to Citibank’s Singapore office totalling $55.8 million and seven transactions to Citibank totalling $48 million.
BNY also flagged 76 payments totalling $17.9m from Macquarie to Barclays in Britain and two payments from National Australia Bank to a Macquarie account holder totalling more than $1.5 million. BNY also flagged four transactions totalling nearly $500,000 flowing from CBA to current AUSTRAC target Westpac.
AUSTRAC and Macquarie have been contacted for comment.
A spokesman for CBA said the bank worked closely with law enforcement bodies and due to regulation it could not share the information about any particular customer.
“We are committed to ensuring that we take appropriate steps to identify, mitigate and manage the money laundering and terrorism financing risk that we face in conducting our business.”
“We recognise that we play a critical role in protecting our customers and the community from the risks associated with money laundering and terrorism financing.”
Source: Thanks smh.com