Apartments in a Melbourne skyscraper that rely on “snorkel bedrooms” for natural light will set a “dangerous precedent,” city planners have found, prompting them to reject plans for the multi-storey tower.
ASX-listed real estate manager Cromwell Property Group wants to reconfigure a Docklands building it owns, currently occupied by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, and bolt-on a 54-storey commercial office, hotel and apartment tower.
But the design of apartments in the fund manager’s soaring, but slender, structure – destined to be the tallest tower in the precinct – has run afoul of Melbourne Council’s planning rules. The controversial “snorkel” bedrooms have no windows to the outside, but windows facing an internal open air column in the building – similar to a lift well that’s open to the sky at the top and has rooms backing on to it.
The plans seem to fly in the face of the “Better Apartment Design Standard” introduced by the city in 2016 in a bid to stamp out poorly lit, shoebox-style developments.
“By 2020 it’s asking too much to overlook them [the rules], no matter what the other merits of an application may be,” said city councillor Rohan Leppart.
“It would be a dangerous precedent to deem that snorkel bedrooms are permissible under the standards: the effectiveness of the standards would be forever weakened.”
Cromwell’s new structure will require demolishing a four-storey building on the north end of its site.
The property manager submitted designs by architects Nettletontribe that will bolt the new building onto an existing A-grade, 14-storey office tower at 700 Collins Street opposite Southern Cross Station.
The group has earmarked some of the 265 apartments in the mixed use project as “build-to-rent” rentals. Expected to cost $310 million to construct, the tower will also have 12,000 square metres of office space and 182 hotel rooms.
Overall, the building was designed to a “high quality” with a “landmark status” and excellent environmental and sustainability targets, city planners said.
Yet the standards had been introduced to make sure snorkel arrangements were avoided as they promoted poor internal amenity, they maintained. The bedrooms’ dimensions were also too small, leading planners to conclude the “shortfalls are significant and therefore unreasonable.”
Ultimately, Melbourne’s planning minister Richard Wynne will decide the tower’s fate, with the plans referred to him for final approval.
The city council’s recommendations – in this case not to support the project – carry significant weight and are usually followed, making it likely a key element of the building will need to be redesigned.
“The standards are there for a reason. New buildings in Melbourne should add to the quality of the city and ensure amenity for future residents,” Mr Leppart said.
Brisbane-headquartered Cromwell has been contacted for comment.
The group is in the midst of a bitter takeover battle with Singapore’s ARA Asset Management, led by Gary Weiss who recently gained a seat on Cromwell’s board.
In partnership with Blackrock, the group recently lodged fresh plans for another major project at Chatswood, in Sydney’s north, that incorporate a third $123 million office tower into that development.
Source: Thanks smh.com