Qantas at odds with aviation workers on latest bargaining proposal
Australia’s largest carrier Qantas is at loggerheads with aviation service workers – responsible for plane safety, scheduling and on-time flight arrivals – over a proposed change to an enterprise agreement.
The Australian Services Union has accused Qantas of widening an existing rift between management and staff by moving to strip pay and conditions from one in three employees, just weeks after reporting improved financial results, managerial pay increases and a shareholder buy-back.
However, the carrier rejects the union’s allegations, arguing its proposal to convert 1300 employees from being covered by the enterprise agreement to management positions will encourage corporate staff to stay with the airline in a tough labour market.
A protracted tussle between Qantas and the union could leave passengers bracing for another bout of service disruptions leading up to the Christmas school holidays.
“This is not in the spirit of Australia. This is the mean spirit of Alan Joyce,” said union’s national secretary Emeline Gaske, adding the proposal would set a “dangerous precedent” for the rest of the Qantas workforce if enacted.
“How is making employees individually negotiate their employment conditions a retention incentive? There’s nothing stopping Qantas giving additional entitlements to employees covered by the agreement.” she continued.
Qantas chief Alan Joyce came under fire last month after the release of the carrier’s annual report revealed he was paid $5.5 million last year, including $2.2 million in cash pay and $3.3 million in bonus shares that could vest if certain goals are met.
The airline said it had restored Joyce’s base salary to 2019 levels because he took zero pay for three months in 2020 and for one month in 2021, in addition to three months on reduced pay in 2021.
Joyce’s relationship with Qantas’s unions has been fraught since he grounded the carrier’s entire fleet in 2011 to prevent industrial action, stranding about 70,000 passengers across the world.
The relationship was further strained after the airline outsourced 1700 ground handling positions, a decision that was found to breach the Fair Work Act and prompted calls for Joyce’s resignation. Qantas is appealing the verdict in the High Court.
A Qantas spokesperson said the carrier was disappointed with the union, arguing that many of its complaints are “simply incorrect.”
Qantas said about 90 per cent of the employees affected by these changes work in corporate roles, such as marketing or finance, and aren’t involved in day-to-day operations of the airline.
It added that there would be no impact on the employees who remain in the enterprise agreement and denied the union’s claim of airport chaos ensuing if the change is enacted.
“In most businesses these roles would be management roles with more flexible working arrangements. Our proposed change means we would be better able to incentivise these employees in line with the market,” a Qantas spokesman said.
While Qantas conceded 10 per cent of workers who would be affected work in operational roles, the union alleges the number is far greater.
“We consider anyone in charge of scheduling or rostering an operational role as critical operations regardless of which building they work in,” Gaske said.
“The idea the person who schedules airport operations or rosters cabin crew would feel rewarded by being a ‘corporate manager’ is ridiculous., it’s blatant penny-pinching.”
“Employees across the board are holding on by the skin of their teeth. We’re talking about the people who schedule airport flow. The idea this won’t result in long queues and other operational issues if not resolved is frankly naive. We just want to rebuild the airline and its reputation” Gaske said.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.
Most Viewed in Business
Source: Thanks smh.com