My hesitancy about attending a union meeting made me feel ashamed

Question:

A while ago, a colleague told me they were attending a union meeting within the building I work in and encouraged me to attend.

I was hesitant. At the time I couldn’t understand why. I felt very strange about my own reluctance, because I would consider myself a person interested in worker rights. I have also been in a union (although not at the moment) and the meeting topic was relevant to my work life.

On reflection, I realise I was worried about what my manager and other colleagues would think – and how they would respond. I think of it as being like a child worried about getting in trouble from the adults. I didn’t attend, and now I feel ashamed. Should I?

Illustration by John Shakespeare
Illustration by John ShakespeareCredit:

Answer:

I asked Bradon Ellem, a professor of employment relations at the University of Sydney Business School, about your question. His response was thorough, illuminating, and I hope really helpful, so I’ll pass it on in full:

“There’s obviously a series of structural, organisational and, in the broadest sense, political components to the ‘hesitancy’ that your inquirer mentions.

“In other words, I’d ask: what’s the wider frame that might bring an individual’s psychology into a response. What I mean by that is there has been a generation-long shift in most global north countries driven by governments and employers away from union recognition and collective bargaining to marginalising organised labour in favour of more individualised arrangements – or, to call a spade a spade, managerial prerogative.

“That’s not a mere anodyne preference among employer lobby groups but an active undoing through legislative change of the once ‘normal’ role of unions in workplaces, as parties to the making of labour standards and enforcers of them. The Fair Work Act didn’t really put a dent in that.

Advertisement

“Leaving aside the details, the big move was to undo unions as part of the fabric of working life and culture, and cast them as outsiders – ‘third parties’. Your inquirer is clearly aware of that.

“Obviously, what this means for any one person varies between places, sectors and occupations, but the great majority of workplaces have no union members so, yes, I think it can be pretty ‘disruptive’ for people to talk about unions there.

“What about your example, where there is a union presence? Given all the other things I’ve just noted, we can see why people would still be, as your correspondent says, ‘worried about what my manager and other colleagues would think’. Going to that meeting might well appear ‘career limiting’. At law, that shouldn’t be the case but, well, there’s law, and then there’s practice.

“Labour markets, workplaces and companies have changed in the last 30 years: we’ve got outsourcing, contracting, casualisation, competition for secure jobs and automation. So, even in this so-called tight labour market, people feeling insecure is not too surprising.

“So, is it all about psychology? No. Should your inquirer feel ‘ashamed’? Not in my view. Their reactions and feelings are simply the last link in a long chain of events designed to make what was once the norm feel ‘frowned upon’.

“In short, what I’d say to your correspondent is: don’t be ashamed but don’t be too intimidated either. It really isn’t you! It’s the design of the system – and everything in that story would be very familiar to union organisers and industrial relations researchers.”

Send your questions to Work Therapy: [email protected]

Most Viewed in Business

Source: Thanks smh.com